How do we move away from being a civilization that produces art that causes comments like, “my five year old could make this,” back to being one that creates beauty and inspires deep questions? We must reject modernity and embrace tradition. To embrace tradition, we must first learn about it.
Let’s study art history together.
Dogs Playing Poker
Poker Game, oil on canvas, 1894
This is art. This is beautiful. Those are good boys. It’s organically and enduring popular. It has something to say. It required talent and a specific vision for its creation. You could proudly hang this up somewhere in your home.
Dogs Playing Poker, by Cassius Marcellus Coolidge, refers collectively to an 1894 painting, a 1903 series of sixteen oil paintings commissioned by Brown & Bigelow to advertise cigars, and a 1910 painting. All eighteen paintings in the overall series feature anthropomorphizeddogs, but the eleven in which dogs are seated around a card table have become well known in the United States as examples of kitsch art in home decoration.
Depictions and reenactments of the series have appeared in many films, television shows, theater productions, and other popular culture art forms. Critic Annette Ferrara has described Dogs Playing Poker as “indelibly burned into … the American collective-schlock subconscious … through incessant reproduction on all manner of pop ephemera“.
The first painting, Coolidge’s 1894 Poker Game, sold for $658,000 at a 2015 auction.
Description
The majority of the paintings ascribed to the Dogs Playing Poker moniker consist of anthropomorphized versions of dogs sitting around a poker table playing poker. The dogs presented are usually larger breeds like collies, Great Danes, St. Bernards, and general mastiffs. Humans do not appear in any of the paintings, and female dogs rarely appear. According to James McManus of The New York Times, the dogs are depicted as “upper-middle-class lawyers and businessmen”, as they drink and smoke at the table. The dogs sit on leather chairs in dimly lit rooms, adorned by a ceiling lamp. Some of the paintings tell a story. For example, in the painting A Bold Bluff, a St. Bernard is holding a pair of deuces, and the other dogs are questioning whether to call his bluff. In the painting Waterloo, the same dogs did not call the St. Bernard’s bluff, and he uses both paws to grab his winnings. Another painting in the series, titled A Friend in Need, depicts a bulldog slipping an ace under the table to the dog sitting next to him. Common themes throughout the Dogs Playing Poker series are deception, mistrust, and confrontation.
Not every painting within the series depicts dogs playing poker. Some paintings depict dogs performing other human activities, such as playing baseball and football. In the painting Riding a Goat, a blindfolded dog sits atop a goat for the amusement of a royal couple.
Coolidge paintings
Pinched with Four Aces (1903)A Friend in Need (1903)Poker Sympathy (1903)Sitting up with a Sick Friend (c. 1905)A Waterloo, 1906
The title of Coolidge’s original 1894 painting is Poker Game.
A Bold Bluff – poker (originally titled Judge St. Bernard Stands Pat on Nothing)
Breach of Promise Suit – testifying in court
A Friend in Need (1903) – poker, cheating
Pinched with Four Aces (1903) – poker
New Year’s Eve in Dogville – ballroom dancing
One to Tie Two to Win – baseball
Pinched with Four Aces – poker, illegal gambling
Poker Sympathy (1903) – poker
Post Mortem – poker, camaraderie
The Reunion – smoking and drinking, camaraderie
Riding the Goat – Masonic initiation
Sitting up with a Sick Friend (1905) – poker, gender relations
Stranger in Camp – poker, camping
Ten Miles to a Garage – travel, car trouble, teamwork
A Waterloo (1906) – poker (originally titled Judge St. Bernard Wins on a Bluff)
These were followed in 1910 by a similar painting, Looks Like Four of a Kind. Other Coolidge paintings featuring anthropomorphized dogs include Kelly Pool, which shows dogs playing kelly pool.
On February 15, 2005, the originals of A Bold Bluff and Waterloo were auctioned as a pair to an undisclosed buyer for US $590,400. The previous top price for a Coolidge was $74,000. In 2015, Poker Game sold for $658,000, currently the highest price paid for a Coolidge.
In literature and the arts
The paintings remained fairly well-known into the 21st century, with various passing references in a number of works.
In the 1999 film The Thomas Crown Affair, Banning believes she finds a stolen Claude Monet painting in Crown’s house. On expert examination it turns out to be a fake painted over a copy of Poker Sympathy, a Dogs Playing Poker canvas. In the 2016 film, The Accountant, the paintings are discussed by the lead characters. Later, a copy of A Friend in Need is used as a cover to hide a Jackson Pollock painting. Glimpses, passing mentions, or short scenes involving the paintings are in the 1991 film Hudson Hawk, the 2009 film Up, the 2006 film Barnyard, and in the 2022 film Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.
In the 1984 play The Foreigner by Larry Shue, a character complains that she doesn’t want to be in her motel room because there is a “Damn picture on the wall of some dogs playin’ poker.”
The cover of the 1981 album, Moving Pictures by Rush, features A Friend in Need as one of the three pictures being moved. The music video for Snoop Dogg‘s 1993 song, “What’s My Name“, depicts dogs playing craps while smoking cigars and wearing sunglasses.
My site and social media lives on the edge of the writers community, online, and that “AI art” conversation can get very heated. If I ever end up publishing anything I’ll have to find an actual artist for the cover or face some backlash.
Some of it looks good, but I don’t know how to feel about it or whether to consider it ‘art’ or not. I’ll have to look into the topic more to really form a good opinion.
I agree. I honestly prefer to find an actual artist to illustrate my books even though it’s more expensive than AI.
AI just doesn’t look real.
Loading...
Agreed, though I have to admit that some of the people whose blogs I read use that “not real” quality really well. I also completely understand (and relate to) wanting to save money paying for an actual artist. I guess that’s a topic that will be tricky for a long while, going forward.
Good point, Dusty. And now they’re calling pictures generated by AI “art” 🤷🏻♀️
My site and social media lives on the edge of the writers community, online, and that “AI art” conversation can get very heated. If I ever end up publishing anything I’ll have to find an actual artist for the cover or face some backlash.
Some of it looks good, but I don’t know how to feel about it or whether to consider it ‘art’ or not. I’ll have to look into the topic more to really form a good opinion.
I agree. I honestly prefer to find an actual artist to illustrate my books even though it’s more expensive than AI.
AI just doesn’t look real.
Agreed, though I have to admit that some of the people whose blogs I read use that “not real” quality really well. I also completely understand (and relate to) wanting to save money paying for an actual artist. I guess that’s a topic that will be tricky for a long while, going forward.