Dusty Art

My prior Art posts can be found HERE.

How do we move away from being a civilization that produces art that causes comments like, “my five year old could make this,” back to being one that creates beauty and inspires deep questions? We must reject modernity and embrace tradition. To embrace tradition, we must first learn about it..

Let’s study art history together.

The Coronation of Napoleon

ArtistJacques-Louis David
Year1805–07 (exhibited 1808)
MediumOil on canvas
Dimensions6.21 m × 9.79 m (20 ft 4 in × 32 ft 1 in)
LocationLouvre, Paris

The Coronation of Napoleon depicts one of the most famous scenes in not only the history of France, but in the history of the world. Bonaparte is widely considered the greatest military general of all time, and his rise to power in France set the stage for many of the geopolitical changes experienced by Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Napoleon is actually such a historically bewildering character that there is a growing number of conspiracy theorists who doubt his actual existence. There is even a documentary – available online, linked below – delving into his actual (non) existence.

Of course, the existence of a painting of his coronation, a painting which existed prior to his fall, goes a long way to make the argument for his actual existence. So the painting is quite important. For more on the painting, we’ll look to wiki:

The Coronation of Napoleon (FrenchLe Sacre de Napoléon) is a painting completed in 1807 by Jacques-Louis David, the official painter of Napoleon, depicting the coronation of Napoleon at Notre-Dame de Paris. The oil painting has imposing dimensions – it is almost 10 metres (33 ft) wide by a little over 6 metres (20 ft) tall. The work is on display at the Louvre Museum in Paris.

History of the work

The work was commissioned by Napoleon orally in September 1804, and Jacques-Louis David started work on it on 21 December 1805 in the former chapel of the College of Cluny, near the Sorbonne, which served as a workshop. Assisted by his student Georges Rouget, he put the finishing touches in January 1808.

From 7 February to 22 March 1808, the work was exhibited at the Salon annual painting display in 1808, and it was presented to the Salon decennial prize competition in 1810. The painting remained the property of David until 1819, when it was transferred to the Royal Museums, where it was stored in the reserves until 1837. Then, it was installed in the Chamber Sacre of the museum of the historical Palace of Versailles on the orders of King Louis-Philippe. In 1889, the painting was transferred to the Louvre from Versailles.

David was commissioned by American entrepreneurs to paint a full size replica, in 1808, immediately after the release of the original. He began work that year, painting it from memory, but didn’t finish until 1822, during his exile in Brussels. The replica was eventually returned to France in 1947, to the original’s place in the Palace of Versailles.

The painting is a subject of The Public Viewing David’s ‘Coronation’ at the Louvre, a painting by Louis-Léopold Boilly done in 1810, in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.

Composition

Sketch by David of Napoleon crowning himself

The composition is organized around several axes, and incorporates the rules of neoclassicism. One axis is that which passes through the cross and has a vertical orientation. A diagonal line runs from the pope to the empress. All eyes are turned towards Napoleon, who is the center of the composition. Napoleon, Pius, and Josephine are illustrated in profile upon the steps towards the altar. The Emblem of the Holy See is hung above the attendants to the left while La Pietà de Notre-Dame de Paris is partially seen at the rightmost edge of the canvass.

Characters

The characters in the painting
  1. Napoleon I (1769–1821), is standing, dressed in coronation robes similar to those of Roman emperors. Others are merely passive spectators. In the actual painting it is possible to see the outline of what was originally painted: Napoleon holding the crown above his own head, as if placing it on himself.
  2. Joséphine de Beauharnais (1763–1814), is kneeling in a submissive position, as called for in the French Civil Code. She received the crown from the hands of her husband, not the pope. Her robe is decorated with silk, according to a contemporary cartoon by Jean-Francois Bony.
  3. Maria Letizia Ramolino (1750–1836), mother of Napoleon, was placed in the stands by the painter. She occupies a place more important than the pope. Actually, she did not attend the ceremony to protest the friction of Napoleon with his brothers Lucien and Joseph. Maria Letizia asked the painter to give Lucien a place of honour. In 1808, when Napoleon discovered the canvas completed in the workshop of David, he was enthralled, and expressed his gratitude to the painter who had managed to convey to posterity the tribute paid to the affection he had towards a woman who shared with him the burden of his office.
  4. Louis Bonaparte (1778–1846), who at the beginning of the empire received the title of grand constable, King of Holland, in 1806. He married Hortense de Beauharnais, the daughter of Josephine.
  5. Joseph Bonaparte (1768–1844), who, after the coronation, received the title of Prince Imperial. Afterwards, he was King of Naples in 1806 and Spain in 1808.
  6. The young Napoleon Charles Bonaparte (1802–1807), son of Louis Bonaparte and Hortense de Beauharnais.
  7. The sisters of Napoleon. In the replica, the dress of Napoleon’s favorite sister is pink. This is the only change in the replica, despite it having been painted from memory.
  8. Charles-Francois Lebrun (1739–1824), the third consul alongside Napoleon and Cambacérès. Under the First Empire, he took the place of prince-architrésorier. He holds the sceptre.
  9. Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès (1753–1824), arch-chancellor prince of the empire. He takes the hand of justice.
  10. Louis-Alexandre Berthier (1753–1815), minister of war under the Consulate. Marshal of the Empire in 1805. He keeps the globe surmounted by a cross.
  11. Talleyrand (1754–1836), grand chamberlain since July 11, 1804.
  12. Joachim Murat (1767–1815), Marshal of the Empire, king of Naples after 1808, brother-in-law of Napoleon and husband of Caroline Bonaparte.
  13. Pope Pius VII (1742–1823), was content to bless the coronation. He is surrounded by clerics, appointed by Napoleon since the Concordat. In order not to jeopardize the new balance between church and state, the Pope accepted to attend the coronation. The original sketches (as was typical in those days) showed the (key) subjects – including the Pope – minus their clothing, which was added in the actual painting. The Pope was originally pictured with his hands crossed in his lap, but Napoleon, supposedly claiming that the Pope was not present to do nothing, instructed that the painting should depict him anointing the proceedings.
  14. The painter Jacques-Louis David is depicted in the stands as well.Detail, turbaned Ottoman ambassador Halet Efendi
  15. Halet Efendi, an Ottoman ambassador, was also present. He is shown below in the detailed picture.
  16. Dom Raphaël de Monachis, Greek-Egyptian monk and member of the Institut d’Égypte, is depicted among the clergymen, standing to the right of the Bishop, with a beard and a red hood.
  17. The female robe bearer in front, right behind Josephine, on the right side from the viewer’s point of view, is Elisabeth-Hélène-Pierre de Montmorency-Laval, mother of politician Sosthènes II de La Rochefoucauld. She was a court lady of Josephine.

The 2023 Ridley Scott film Napoleon recreated the painting in the scene depicting the coronation of Napoleon. The scene in the film included a shot of Jacques-Louis David drawing a sketch of the coronation for the painting.

I don’t know that the painting alone proves that Napoleon actually existed, but it is a strong argument. The commissioning of paintings, and replicas of paintings, leave a paper trail.

Though it happens rarely, sometimes the lives of real men take on an almost mythological nature – even while the subject remains alive.

I will say regarding the painting that I am a big fan of the neoclassical style. I fully support bringing that style back for permanent use in official government paintings. That style of art won’t ever be out of style. Classical is classical for a reason. Two recent non-traditional and very high profile government paintings (shown below) will likely look like oddities in the future – or perhaps signs of long term national decline.

His Majesty King Charles III is a portrait of King Charles III by Jonathan Yeo.
President Barack Obama is an oil-on-canvas portrait of Barack Obama, the 44th president of the United States, completed by the artist Kehinde Wiley 

The first of those looks like the King is bathing in blood, or it is perhaps implying that the King is a resident of hell, surrounded by fire. Even if by some chance that it’s true of him, why would you advertise that to the public via his official portrait?

The second is just odd, as an official portrait – though at least President Obama sitting among foliage isn’t overtly sinister. It might have been fine in another less official context (like sitting on Pres. Obama’s mantel.) The problem with it as an official portrait is that it looks like a rejection of the institution for which he was the elected representative (or perhaps a coded message regarding allegiance to the Bush family?) It doesn’t fit in well with the portraits that came before, or those that follow, such that it may likely look increasingly ludicrous over time. I doubt he wanted to send a message to the future saying, “I was ludicrous.” He should have remembered that classical is timeless.

Official portraits bathed in blood, or sitting in a hedge, will age like disco, bellbottom jeans, and harvest gold refrigerators.

6 thoughts on “Dusty Art

  1. I enjoyed this post. I agree with your comments about the dubious choices made by the artists in these two contemporary portraits. I do prefer a traditional depiction with some room for artistic expression or we would just resort to photography.

    1. I think there’s room for variety in another setting (even if I think the variety is ugly) but it seems really out of place to go non-traditional for the official portrait of a head of state.

    1. Thanks! I think President Obama’s bush portrait radicalized me on this topic, Lol. Then the King Charles portrait took that to another level. Now I’m writing blog posts about art – something i never intended to be doing.

  2. Napoleons are as real as the crumbs down your shirt—just visit a bakery and prepare to meet history layered in custard and puff pastry!

Leave a Reply to DustyCancel reply